On Oct 21, 2007 7:12 AM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > >> Maybe it would make more sense to do these changes in commons-jci-fam > >> first and then move that to a new commons-fam? > >> > > > > Sounds reasonable, although I still think IO is a better home for fam > > than a separate component. > In any case, it would be creat if the code is built in a way that makes > it possible to plug VFS in there too. The VFS fam is far from being > perfect :-(
I'm not sure how this would be possible - since we would need to abstract away from java.io.File - which is exactly what VFS does. For me theres value in a "closer to the metal" impl. that just deals with java.io.File and an abstract VFS version. Niall > Ciao, > Mario --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
