On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for the feedback. Replies below ... > > On 12/8/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tag: > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/tags/SCXML_0_7_RC1/ > > > > > > Artifacts: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/ > > > > There's a clirr report here - does that not belong under the site structure? > > Also could not find a link to a clirr report under site. > > > <snip/> > > I've been adding clirr reports after the fact (running clirr at > command line) so folks can glance at changes. I agree it would be good > to add a report to the site, I'll need to look at m1 plugin, get it > going etc. >
OK, understood. Which reminds me - what about the RAT report? > > Sigs and hashes all OK. > > Manifests and notices etc look OK (did not check all the files, just a > > sample) > > > > The src.zip does not contain: > > [- doa-scxml.rdf - not needed] > > - pom.xml > > - PROPOSAL.html -? > > - STATUS.html -? > > - xdocs\usecases\scxml-stopwatch 8 jpg files are missing > > > <snap/> > > Yup, doap not necessary. PROPOSAL and STATUS are archival things that > don't really pertain to any release (actually, STATUS is more cruft > than anything else ;-). pom.xml not in since I personally haven't used > the m2 build a lot (but I know atleast 'mvn install' works so I guess > it could be added). s/could/should/ - please ;-) > I looked at the src zip and the 8 jpegs you list seem to be in there. > Can you point directly to the file that doesn't have them? Sorry, I was wrong ... There was a problem with the extraction process - the files were there, but for some reason they were in a different directory - SCXML-ST instead of scxml-stopwatch. This was using Winzip command-line; Winzip GUI works OK. Weird - looks like it suddenly decided to convert the directory name to DOS 8.3 format. > > > > > > Staged site: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/site/ > > > > The dependency page is nice and clear. > > junit 3.8.2 has been out for some while, just wondering why that is not > > used? > > > <snip/> > > No reason, I'll upgrade at the next chance. OK, no rush. > > > Javadoc warnings report says Files: 0 - is that normal if there are no > > warnings? > > I would have thought the files should still be counted even if there are > > none. > > > <snap/> > > Me too, that report generation may not be working. Will have to look > into it at some point (I think we're fairly complete on Javadocs in > general). OK. Maybe drop the report if it does not show anything useful (and avoid possible future questions about it) > -Rahul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
