On Jan 8, 2008 10:24 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 08/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2008 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 8, 2008 12:17 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I thought there were some licensing issues related to using Cobertura? > > > > > > > > e.g. > > > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--all--Commons-SCXML-0.7-RC1-available-p14278429.html > > > > > > Only on distrubuting in releases - fine to use on the web site. > > > > For any components wanting to use it and distribute the docs/site in > > the distro - then we can just simply exclude the three GPL licensed > > javascript files - I've tried this out with Commons IO and the report > > seems to work fine without them: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=609834 > > Niall > > > > I just saw that. > > How can one ensure that the JS files are excluded from distributions?
Thats what the change I made to the assembly descriptor is doing. > Is it possible to add exclusions via the parent POM? > > At the very least it seems to me that the parent POM needs to document > which files must be excluded, and how to exclude them. > > Perhaps RAT will (or can be updated to) report on violations? You can run rat on the (unpacked) binary distro, but it does flag up a alot of files since generated filles (e.g. javadocs) don't include source headers. > Alternatively, the parent POM could delete the JS files after running > the report, so that there is no possibility of them being included in > distributions. Yes I guess this could be done with the antrun plugin. Niall > > > Niall > > > > > > > > > > On 07/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'd like to update the version for the cobertura-maven-plugin before > > > > > we > > > > > release this. The version currently being used is broken. Is that OK? > > > > > > > > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last > > > > > > release used commons-parent version 4 and the only real change is to > > > > > > upgrade to the latest version 6 of commons-parent. > > > > > > > > > > > > A full diff of the pom.xml can be found at this address: > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-sandbox-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=609497&r2=564663&diff_format=h > > > > > > > > > > > > There are no changes to the site.xml. > > > > > > > > > > > > The version number in the pom will be updated automatically during > > > > > > the > > > > > > release process. > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > > > > > [ ] =0 > > > > > > [ ] -1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Vote is open for 72 hours > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
