On 2/28/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Author: niallp > > > Date: Mon Feb 4 00:55:29 2008 > > > New Revision: 618207 > > > <snip/> > > > > No trim() vs. trim() -- desired change? > > > It was intentional - <snap/>
OK, thanks. -Rahul > the original AbstractArrayConverter from which > this code was derived didn't trim - also this new ArrayConverter > delegates individual element conversion to an appropriate converter, > so those delegates could do this and, for example, the new numeric > converter implementations do trim (from memory) and so for numeric > arrays its not an issue. > > Niall > > > > -Rahul > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
