On 3/5/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo > (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the Java > version on the dependencies page. The feedback I got was they prefer > it on the project summary page - so I submitted a patch for that as > well. > > Logging is an example of using different source/target versions: > http://commons.apache.org/logging/dependencies.html > http://commons.apache.org/logging/project-summary.html > > BeanUtils is an example of the same source/target versions: > http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/dependencies.html > http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/project-summary.html > > My preference is to have it on the dependencies page, because I think > people are more likely to look there - but perhaps both places would > be good. I haven't had any feedback since I submitted the second > pacth, so If you think its a good idea for commons then it would be > good to vote for that JIRA bug: >
I agree that it should be on the dependencies page, but it couldn't hurt to have it on the project summary page also. Very nice, by the way! > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-80 > > Niall > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
