On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2]. > The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly > incorrect in some places, such as the dependency tree and transitivity > of optionality.
I re-generated the sites afte updating components to version 8 of commons-parent. Unfortunately this picked up a copy in my local repo of the maven-project-info-reports-plugin built from the latest source - as well as my Java version changes there seems to be other bugs in that version. This was accidental and unintentional on my part and in version 9 of commons-parent the maven-project-info-reports-plugin version is specified, so it shouldn't happen again. Re-generating the scxml dependencies page now results in the following: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/scxml/dependencies.html I will try to find time to re-publish all the sites at some point to correct this, unless someone beats me to it. Niall > I'd like to get other opinions. > > -Rahul > > [1] > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc2/site/dependencies.html > [2] http://commons.apache.org/scxml/dependencies.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
