On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:56 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/05/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > > > > Using m1.0.2? Thats the recommended version in Commons (see building > > page in site, for example). > > No, that would have been 1.1. > > I have got 1.0.2 installed, but I thought that was only needed for > Java 1.3 builds. > <snap/>
For consistency, we've been using 1.0.2 for all components, AFAIK. > > I'm not very happy with using Java 1.5 to get round problems in M2. > > Seems to be cheating to me. > > AIUI, this is intended to be an M2 release, and is supposed to be > targetted at 1.4+ - yet it's not possible to regenerate the build > using Java 1.4 and M2. > <snip/> Fair enough, I'll try to stick to 1.4 via the other hack (the source assembly descriptor hard-coding). > I know this affects a lot of Commons projects - all the more reason > for the M2 bug to be sorted... > <snap/> Agreed. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
