Well, the  machine I setup was an Intel-based machine (pentium 4 I
believe), just for playing around with Solaris.  This seems like a
quick way to get started playing with Solaris! :)  It's got JDK1.5 on
it right now I believe.  I'll try to run the tests tonight when I get
home.  Or, you could use the "zone" Brett mentioned.  Just let me
know.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> that was quick ... :-)
>
> +) any Solaris version would do
> +) the standalone tests suite is here :
> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> James Carman wrote:
>>
>> What version of Solaris needs coverage?  I just installed a copy of
>> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday.  I might be able to run the
>> test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>>> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>>>
>>> The current state of the commons-exec
>>> (http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
>>>
>>> +) I made my first bug fix in April 2007 after finding out that I have
>>> the
>>> karma to mess up the project ... :-)
>>> +) I officially took over the code in November 2007
>>> +) I went through all the open JIRAs and fixed them including regression
>>> tests
>>> +) I cleaned up the code and javadocs
>>> +) removed commons-logging dependency
>>> +) added a few more features plus regression tests
>>> +) with the help of the commons community commons-exec was tested on
>>> various
>>> platforms and JVMs (see
>>> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/testmatrix.html)
>>> +) I was promoted to commons committer in April 2008
>>> +) there was some interest in getting/using commons-exec from the user
>>> community
>>> +) I use commons-exec in production for more than on year
>>>
>>> The not so good things
>>>
>>> +) unfortunately we have no coverage on Solaris and broken tests on
>>> OpenVMS
>>> - the missing Solaris coverage is IMO critical
>>> +) I am the one and only person actively maintaining the code
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>
>>> PS: I just uploaded the website but it will take a while to be available
>>> ....
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to