You could certainly use Commons Proxy to adapt your JDK proxy "handler" to other dynamic proxy technologies.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, James, talking about Commons > interdependencies and underuse of [proxy], I'd been > meaning to ask you to have a look at [flatfile], > specifically > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/flatfile/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/flatfile/ImmutableEntity.java > and see if you could offer a recommendation on whether > [proxy] looked like a good fit there (last time I > looked at [proxy] I didn't quickly grasp just how to > go about using it). > > Thanks, > Matt > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> All, >> >> I recently proposed to the Google Guice project that >> they might >> benefit from Commons Proxy. Brian Pontarelli had >> some interesting >> things to say, in general, about Commons projects: >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/browse_thread/thread/ac60750fa62b78e8 >> >> I thought some of you might be interested. I don't >> know well he >> represents the general public, but I do know that >> we've taken quite a >> bit of heat for not converting to JDK5 syntax on our >> projects. >> >> James >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
