On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Ralph Goers schrieb:
I will need to add one more feature - I need the exact opposite of
SystemConfiguration. I need to be able to read a file and
instantiate all the keys and values as system properties. I
haven't decided on the best approach to do this so any advice is
welcome.
From the API's point of view, would it make sense to add a static
method like addProperties(Configuration c) to SystemConfiguration
that iterates over the keys of the passed in configuration and adds
them as system properties?
I don't know. I really haven't given enough thought on how to do this
yet. I just know I have it as a requirement as something we need.
In the meantime though, I'm fine with a 1.6 release.
So the system properties feature needs not to go into 1.6? For me it
does not really matter. There is no need to hurry, and I am not sure
when I find the time for the release anyway.
If I don't come up with something before you want to do a release just
go ahead.
BTW there are some checkstyle warnings in the new classes you
committed. Most of them are formatting issues. Do you want to have a
look or should I deal with them?
Thanks, I will take care of it.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]