On 17/12/2008, at 9:24 AM, sgoes...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sgoeschl
Date: Tue Dec 16 14:24:20 2008
New Revision: 727197
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=727197&view=rev
Log:
Cleaning up for creating a second release candidate (is good for
your character I was told)
Modified:
commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
Modified: commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml?rev=727197&r1=727196&r2=727197&view=diff
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
======================================================================
--- commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml (original)
+++ commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml Tue Dec 16
14:24:20 2008
@@ -23,7 +23,10 @@
<author email="sgoes...@apache.org">Siegfried Goeschl</author>
</properties>
<body>
- <release version="1.0-SNAPSHOT" date="as in SVN"
description="Sandbox release">
+ <release version="1.0.0" date="2008-12-16" description="Sandbox
release">
+ <action dev="sgoeschl" type="fix">
+ Fixed broken "groupId" from "org.apache.commons" to
"commons-exec"
+ </action>
I need to read up the discussion on the earlier release, but why would
you want to change that? Given that this is the first release of a
component, using the newer group ID seems to make more sense.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
