On 2009-03-06, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2009-03-06, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Adding back the .getClassLoader() stage improves matters,
>> That really isn't supposed to make any difference, strange.
> Class.getResource() makes these changes to the resource name:
> "if the resource name starts with "/", it is unchanged; otherwise, the
> package name is prepended to the resource name after converting "." to
> "/". "
> ClassLoader.getResource() does not do this.
I knew that (but assumed the path names were startng with a slash), it
shouldn't make any difference WRT whitespace was what I meant.
Sorry I was unclear
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
