Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 03:18:
> By contrast, SLF4J supports many more variations of these, primarily
> because it supports Markers (which I will refer to in a moment). In
> addition, SLF4J supports a message syntax that in many cases
> eliminates the need to wrap all the logging calls with if
> (logger.isXXXEnabled()).
All true, but fix me if I'm wrong: My understanding is that SLF4J
requires recompiling the sources. That's a blocker, IMO.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how to use my telephone.
-- (Bjarne Stroustrup,
http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#really-say-that
My guess: Nokia E50)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
