Jörg Schaible a écrit :

Yes, because then the artifact name is the same as for the 1.x series and it
is no longer possible to use both artifacts at the same time with Maven.

As long as the groupId/artifactId for Commons Configuration 1.x and 2.x are different shouldn't they be able to coexist?

I suggest to change the name of the jar produced, but the artifactId would remain 'commons-configuration2'.

Emmanuel Bourg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to