Niall Pemberton wrote:
I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
feedback from the first.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
[ ] -1 No, because...
The tag for RC3 is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/
The release artefacts are here
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/
Site is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/
(note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to
proper codec home)
RAT Report:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/rat-report.html
CLIRR Report:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/clirr-report.html
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/changes-report.html
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Thanks
Niall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Sigs and hashes are good and both ant and maven builds work fine on jdk
1.4-1.6.
I see there are 2 issues open with fix version = 1.4 and 3 more that are
uncategorized.
I am +1 on this release assuming the open issues can be assigned to a
later release.
Are all of the files in the top-level directory of the source
distribution necessary, still-maintainted, and relevant?
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
