On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure who is looking after Continuum for Commons, but it might be > useful to add Jexl 2.0 to the list. > <snip/>
Yes (and its time to move the 2.0 branch to trunk now, with 1.x being a branch, IMO). I don't remember fiddling with continuum for Commons myself, so I probably don't have the right karma on the vmbuild instance either. -Rahul > Also, the builds all seem to use Java 1.6, however no Commons > components actually require Java 1.6 yet. > > Java 1.6 allows certain constructs which cause errors in Java 1.5, so > defaulting to 1.6 means that some coding errors are not caught. > > Seems to me that it would be more useful (or at least as useful) to > build each component with its target Java version (though one would > have to use a minimum of Java 1.4). > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
