On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr>wrote:
> When this topic was discussed previously, Sam asked to someone called > Bjorn-Ove and the reply was positive, see > <http://markmail.org/message/gmapelqh3u5gquzr>. > > Ok, so reading this thread left it at the following: 1) the maintainers of MTJ were all willing to relicense it as Apache, that which wasn't already BSD licensed. So licenses are workable. 2) there was discussion about what level of native code / generated code would be acceptable in [math], which the consensus was that java source code was required, but f2j had some weird post-processing on .class files necessary, meaning that to include mtj, [math] would need to depend on: a) Fortran source code files which could be included, or b) compiled java jars which have the translated BLAS/LAPACK code Does 2) hinder the acceptability of MTJ in [math] ? JIRA tickets MATH-269, MATH-270, and MATH-271 haven't been commented on since they were created back in May... -jake
