Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi Folks, > If you change groupId could you please provide a relocation pom in the > old groupId > commons-dbcp:commons-dbcp:1.3 -> org.apache.commons:commons-dbcp-jdbc3:1.3
Will do if we decide to go that route. Phil > > -- > Olivier > > 2009/11/26 Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>: >> Paul Benedict wrote: >>> Phil, >>> >>> I don't think you should be modifying the version (and groups, really) >>> here. All the artifacts belong to version 1.3. >>> >>> Maven does have a concept of a qualifier, but according to Sonatype, >>> it's only to capture milestone builds: >>> http://www.sonatype.com/books/maven-book/reference/pom-relationships-sect-pom-syntax.html >>> >>> What you have, simply, is, different artifacts. >> Makes sense. Thanks. >> >> Keep the same groupId >>> and version, just alter the artifact names. >> What I was trying to avoid by moving the groupId to >> org.apache.commons for the JDBC 4 artifact was 1.4-1.5 users >> unwittingly upgrading to 1.3 and blowing up. This is also a change >> we need to make at some point. >> >> Phil >>> JDBC 4 version (JDK 1.6) >>> groupId = org.apache.commons >>> artifactId = commons-dbcp >>> version = 1.3 >>> >>> JDBC 3 version (JDK 1.4-1.5) >>> groupId = org.apache.commons >>> artifactId = commons-dbcp-jdbc3 >>> version = 1.3 >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>> I am about to roll an RC and I need to make sure all are OK with the >>>>> artifact names and repo placement >>>>> >>>>> JDBC 4 version (JDK 1.6) >>>>> groupId org.apache.maven >>>> Oops! I obviously mean commons above :) >>>>> artifactID commons-dbcp >>>>> version 1.3 >>>>> >>>>> JDBC 3 version (JDK 1.4-1.5) >>>>> groupId commons-dbcp >>>>> artifactId commons-dbcp >>>>> version 1.3-jdbc3 >>>>> >>>>> Giving the 1.3 name to the 1.6 version makes sense as this is the >>>>> main development version. Moving it gets it into compliance with >>>>> the maven standard and avoids unintended consequences of upgrading >>>>> for 1.4-1.5 users by requiring a bigger change. >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively, we could put descriptors on both and leave placement >>>>> as is. Opinions please. >>>>> >>>>> Phil >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
