I think we should reduce the overloading and just accept Object. From
the runtime type, we can determine how to do further checks. Then, we
can nicely implement 1 args, 2, args, ... and finally var-args overloads.
Paul
On 11/26/2009 10:49 PM, James Carman wrote:
So, what you're concerned with is the first parameter (the "thing" we
want to check, which we do so by reflection)? Why do we need to
change its type?
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Paul Benedict<pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
James,
Yes. I want to also eliminate the static types of all the overloaded
methods. We don't need a version for maps, one for char sets, one for
objects, one for collections, etc. We can do all those checks dynamically.
This was my point of my original email. What are your thoughts on it?
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
