You should have the rights. Make the branch into the sandbox rather than inside digester. Something like:
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester-anno/ svn cp -m "Branching into the sandbox for annotation changes to digester" https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester-anno/branch-name On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, Jochen, Rahul, > thanks for your help, fine for me working on a branch, I'm more than > pleased to adopt the best solution that fits with the community needs > :) > I don't think I have the rights needed to branch the digester, can > anyone help me please? Many thanks in advance, more than appreciated! > Best regards, have a nice day! > Simo > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi Jochen, >>> sorry for the delay (I'm currently at office), I think it is better if >>> we involve Rahul Akolkar (CC-ed in the mail): I'm an ASF committer but >>> not a Digester neither Commons committer; in this scenario I propose >>> to let the community express the opinion in having this new feature >>> included in a next feature release, if they're interested I think it >>> could be good investing efforts on it. >> <snip/> >> >> I've been traveling for a couple of weeks (and mostly offline), but >> otherwise interested in these happenings. >> >> As I mentioned when you posted your proposal initially (not in a >> position to dig up a link to the archives), I think this feature has >> good merits in certain usecases and could even be included in the >> digester trunk when ready. Now that you have access to the Commons >> sandbox, I think its best to work on a digester branch in the sandbox >> (as suggested already by others) rather than treating it as a separate >> component. Having said that, whatever works best for you is fine to >> get the ball rolling here. >> >> Finally, were you a Commons committer already, the sandbox branch too >> would have been unnecessary (you could have worked on trunk itself). >> >> -Rahul >> >> >> >>> Let me know, have a nice day :) >>> Simo >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann >>> <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> very nice to meet you! I imported the digester as dependency since, >>>>> fortunately, I don't have to modify the existing code, but just adding >>>>> a new package that contains the new feature. >>>> >>>> Just adds to my concerns. If you are not even modifying existing code, >>>> one might even consider not to create a branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling! >>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > http://www.google.com/profiles/simone.tripodi > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
