My general thinking is: "+1, thanks for doing this"
mixed with: "We now have two versions in development at the same time, we can no longer just charge along coding - we need process" Namely, do we put anything in 2.5 as long as it doesn't affect backwards compat, do we keep adding enhancements, do we only do bugfixes (or critical bugfixes)? It starts to feel that we need to emulate Tomcat's methodology more of working in trunk then voting particular patches back into the legacy version. Hen On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > For anyone who hasn't noticed I've been back-porting Commons Lang > changes from the trunk to a 2.x branch: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/ > > AFAIC its getting close to being ready for a 2.5 release. LANG-204 is > currently in progress and I will try to post a summary of whats been > back ported (and what hasn't) tomorrow. Other than that I have only > updating the site and getting the release notes & changes plugin up to > date on my todo list. > > Is there anything anyone else wants included? > > Niall > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
