On 17/02/2010, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:56 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 17/02/2010, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:36 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On 17/02/2010, nia...@apache.org <nia...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> Author: niallp > >> >> Date: Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010 > >> >> New Revision: 910963 > >> >> > >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910963&view=rev > >> >> Log: > >> >> Update copyright year to 2010 > >> >> > >> >> Modified: > >> >> commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt > >> >> > >> >> Modified: commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt > >> >> URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt?rev=910963&r1=910962&r2=910963&view=diff > >> >> > ============================================================================== > >> >> --- commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt (original) > >> >> +++ commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010 > >> >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > >> >> Apache Commons Daemon > >> >> -Copyright 1999-2004 The Apache Software Foundation > >> >> +Copyright 1999-2010 The Apache Software Foundation > >> > > >> > According to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910962&view=rev the > >> > inception year is 2002, so how can one claim copyright before that? > >> > >> > >> The code originated in Tomcat - see > http://markmail.org/message/yh7c3oyqyh5krfo5 > > > > In that case, I suggest the POM is updated to say why it disagrees > > with the NOTICE, because this is unusual. > > > Added - see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=910979 >
Many thanks! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
