On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/03/2010, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 01/03/2010, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  > Hi,
>>  >
>>  >  I'd like to release version 13 of the commons-parent pom - the changes
>>  >  since the last release are:
>>  >
>>  >   - Upgrade to use commons-build-plugin 1.2 (for improved download pages)
>>  >   - Change OSGi config to not import exported packages
>>  >   - only generate javadocs, rather than full site in the "rc" profile
>>  >  (fixes problem with multi-module components)
>>  >   - Upgrade from version 4 to 7 of the apache parent pom
>>  >   - Upgrade maven plugins to latest release versions
>>  >
>>  >  A full diff of the pom.xml can be found at this address:
>>  >  
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=917324&r2=827809&diff_format=h
>>  >
>>  >  The version number in the pom will be updated automatically during the
>>  >  release process.
>>  >
>>  >  [ ] +1
>>  >  [ ] =0
>>  >  [ ] -1
>>  >
>>  >  Vote is open for 72 hours
>>
>>
>> I've discovered a problem with the parent pom:
>>
>>  javadoc:jar reports:
>>
>>  [INFO]    task-segment: [javadoc:jar]
>>  [INFO] 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  [WARNING] DEPRECATED [aggregate]: since 2.5. Use the goals
>>  <code>javadoc:aggregate</code> and <code>javadoc:test-aggregate</code>
>>  instead.
>>  [INFO] [javadoc:jar {execution: default-cli}]
>>  [INFO]
>>
>
> Deleting line 330
>    <aggregate>false</aggregate>
> seems to do the trick when experimenting with EXEC, but I've no idea
> if dropping the line will cause errors in other projects.

I have removed this.

> Also just noticed that
>
> mvn javadoc:test-jar
>
> does not include the N&L files in the jar,

I looked at fixing this - but we currently have the "antrun" plugin
configured to do this - but it doesn''t get executed when that single
goal is done (neither does mvn javadoc:jar include the N&L - its tied
to a standard phase, so you have to do something like mvn package. So
unless someone else has an idea, I don't know how to fix this.

> and the MANIFEST does not
> have the same details as the main code javadoc jar. Not essential, but
> if it can be fixed easily then let's add it?

I've fixed this - also same problem occurred whe running mvn
javadoc:jar which is now fixed:

Niall

>>
>>  >  Niall
>>  >
>>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to