Hi. > [...] OLS regression (350 - good catch!) also > obviously needs to be fixed. Thanks to all for testing.
There is indeed a difference from what CM 2.0 computed but maybe that it is not a problem after all, and is just to be expected from the implementation change: some failing tests compare values produced by CM 2.0 to values produced by the current code allowing a tolerance of 1e-13. When setting the tolerance to 1e-12, the tests pass. Those tests cannot prove that the values from CM 2.0 were "better" than the current ones. Looking into the issue with Dimitri, the problem initially referred to in MATH-350 may in fact be related to the user's code. I'm waiting for her feedback in order to write some (possibly final) comments on JIRA. Best, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
