I'm not sure that I'm prepared to block a release for a really really trivial point like this...
On 23 Mar 2010, at 22:42, sebb wrote: > On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org <rwins...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb >> for helping with some issues around the release. >> Binary compatibility has been sacrificed in a few minor cases, however it >> is extremely unlikely the affected methods/constants were ever used so this >> should not be a problem. > > At the very least, these incompatibilities should be noted in the release > notes. > > In the case of MOD_TIME, the field could have been kept but deprecated > (if necessary). > I've not looked at the others yet. > > -1 until the documentation is sorted out. > >> Tag: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC_6/ >> >> Site: >> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/net/2.1/RC6/site/index.html >> >> Binaries: >> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/net/2.1/RC6/ >> >> [ ] +1 release it >> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care >> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
