Interesting question. I think it should - unless the method Modifier.isPublic method check checks that already.
Have you tried a test case to see if this would return an invalid constructor? On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:10 AM, D Sledge <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the method ConstructorUtils.getAccessibleConstructor(Constructor), > I notice that the method checks if the declaring class is public. Should it > not also make sure that the declaring class is either a top-level one or its > enclosing class hierarchy are all public, too? > > D > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
