On 27/03/2010, Gary Gregory <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> Since multiple @since tags are allowed and are treated like multiple @author
> tags, what about making use of that? For example:
>
> ...
> * @since 2.0
> * @since 3.0
-1, very confusing - what does it mean?
> */
> public static String capitalize(CharSequence cs) {
> ...
>
> Or maybe:
>
> * @since 2.0
> * @since 3.0 changed from capitalize(String) to capitalize(CharSequence)
+1
> Or something like that, since the @since text is free form.
>
>
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Seagull Software
> email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
> email: ggreg...@apache.org
> www.seagullsoftware.com
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 14:49
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [lang] v3.0 @since
> >
> > I think so. If a recompile would make it work, then no need to update
> > the @since. It would be lovely to say @improved 3.0; but at the end of
> > the day I think we'll have to rely on separate documentation to handle
> > that.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Gary Gregory
> > <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > Fair enough.
> > >
> > > What about APIs that change from, for example, String to
> > CharSequence, should these stay with the same @since tags, even if the
> > Java version for the project of the @since version did not include the
> > class CharSequence.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 19:23
> > >> To: Commons Developers List
> > >> Subject: Re: [lang] v3.0 @since
> > >>
> > >> I think it does.
> > >>
> > >> The choice of a new package name was a workaround rather than a
> > >> declaration of a different package, so the @since's still have
> > value.
> > >>
> > >> Hen
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Gary Gregory
> > >> <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > >> > Looking at trunk I see that the @since tags are still there. Since
> > the
> > >> package o.a.c.lang3 is new, does it make sense to have @since tags
> > OTHER than
> > >> 3.0 if any?
> > >> >
> > >> > Gary Gregory
> > >> > Senior Software Engineer
> > >> > Seagull Software
> > >> > email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
> > >> > email: ggreg...@apache.org
> > >> > www.seagullsoftware.com
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
