On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:05 PM, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks a lot for this summarized procedure. I was able to upload > JEXL-2.0.1-RC1 using it. > > One important difference with the published procedure is that the only place > where we actually state 'release candidate' status is on the staging site > name and the SVN tag. (MATH 2.0 RC3 seems to do this for example). The > produced artefacts (jar doc etc) do not carry the RC status. Do I understand > this correctly?
Yes because we want to vote on the actual artifacts that are going to be distributed, if the vote is successful. > I've also seen some discussion about using Nexus; I suppose parts of the > process will be revisited to benefit from its features. Is there any > draft/alpha/wiki place where this future is discussed? >From a Commons PoV then its just here on the d...@commons mailing list - the maven has some docs on how to do it I believe. Niall > Thanks again, > Henrib > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/Staging-publishing-procedure-and-tools-tp1695256p1745102.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
