Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > I noticed that when fully-qualified names are used, the text layout > sometimes becomes fairly ugly (lines of uneven lengths). We could just refer > to the short name since it should be a link to the corresponding javadoc > (where the reader can see the package name). > I agree with you on this. For context, we should just make sure that somewhere "nearby" there is a reference to the package. It was my laziness in providing that that led to the convention of including the full path in the links. That was OK when the package structure was small and simple; but it is now pretty ugly. +1 for shortening the links.
Phil > > Best, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
