On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Torsten Curdt <[email protected]> wrote: > In the code we call it "Archivername". That should be changed > accordingly to "type" then IMO. (getArchiveName() could be a little > ambiguous) >
no objections against the type, but: really change? I was thinking on backwards compatibility --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
