On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working to prepare the initial commit for my Google >> Summer of Code project. I have a quick question regarding external >> libraries. My project currently uses a few libraries which are >> licensed under liberal, non-copyleft licenses. A list of these >> libraries and their associated licenses is as follows: >> >> Mozilla Rhino - MPL >> Dojo JavaScript toolkit - BSD/AFL dual license >> Selenium - Apache 2.0 License >> js-beautify - something a bit non-standard: >> http://github.com/einars/js-beautify/blob/master/license.txt >> json2 - Public Domain >> > <snip/> > > I'll first address the licenses and then get to the how to include the > libraries bit. > > You may have seen the following categorization of licenses we use > (Category A is generally easier to incorporate than B): > > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-a > > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-b > > Given that, the above list you have looks OK: > * Assuming we'll only depend on Rhino binaries > * The js-beautify license seems reasonable, we may have to ping the > ASF Legal Affairs committee for a definite answer
js-beautify license == MIT. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
