It seems like Oracle might be a bit more receptive to stuff like this going forward. Good luck!
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Bill Rossi <b...@rossi.com> wrote: > > No it had not occured to me. I can look into that. > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, James Carman wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Bill Rossi <b...@rossi.com> wrote: >>> >>> 2.) I also think there there is the perception that the existing methods >>> are >>> good enough, so its probably not a high priority. >>> >> >> Fair enough. Have you thought of approaching the folks at the OpenJDK >> project? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
