Why not just use JAXB 2.0 which includes annotations? What itch does this code scratch that hasn't been done already? Does your code support going from the objects to the XML? Most of the time when you have these XML -> object situations, it's nice to be able to go the other way, also (such as is the case with JAXB).
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all guys, Digester maintainers, > time ago[1] I proposed a sandbox[1] to work on a new feature for the > digester, adding the Java5 Annotation analysis to create Digester > rules. > I didn't have the need to modify the original digester code, but > rather I added a new package where adding the new feature, and without > adding any new dependency. > Time has passed, progresses on the design have been done, tests[3] go > on green bar :) > I'd really appreciate if anyone can help me on: > > * promoting that code on the current /trunk development (I'm already > an Apache committer/PMC member, but not in commons); > * writing the documentation (I'm not a native English speaker). > > I'm confident we can include that feature in the next Digester > release, I really hope someone can help me :) > Have a nice day, best regards, > Simo > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/w33bwwfnbev75fuv > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk > [3] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/ > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
