Hi, Long, Replies below:
On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote: > I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target is a > necessary element for a transition. > The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not required. In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static Reaction, as defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of statecharts. >From the spec: The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition to. If it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained in the transition will still be executed, so the transition will function as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal to the state containing the transition element, the transition will cause the state machine to leave and then re-enter this state. From: http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#transition > To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a big > thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ? > What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability. Jake --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
