On Aug 8, 2010, at 7:53 PM, James Carman wrote: > +1. I'm good with that. I think that's where most people would tend > to look. I would doubt if most folks even know that the CharSequence > interface exists. >
Add my +1 to the pile. -Matt > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: >> So I'm wondering if this should exist, or if it should stay in StringUtils. >> >> Personally I think String is a good colloquialism for CharSequence and >> we don't need to create a new class. >> >> i.e. >> >> StringUtils.length(CharSequence) == good. >> >> Hen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
