On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:08 AM, James Carman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:32 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why not split the code into two methods:
>>
>> public static <K,V> Map<K, V> toMap(Map.Entry<K,V>[] array)
>> and
>> public static <K,V> Map<K, V> toMap(Class<K> keyType, Class<V>
>> valueType, Object[][] array)
>>
>> Both methods can be made type-safe.
>>
>
> Well, we did just bump the version number, so we are free to do
> something like that I guess. Anyone else have any thoughts on the
> subject (are you even paying attention anymore)?
>
In the spirit of the Map.Entry variant of the method, I would suggest eating
our own lang3 dog food and providing:
public static <K, V> Map<K, V> toMap(Pair<K, V>... entries)
as well. Pair.of("foo", "bar") is certainly a terser option than creating an
anonymous implementation of Map.Entry.
-Matt
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
