I had a look at the ant build that Gump executes, the 'test' target
doesn't ignore abstract test case, adding the following lines:
<exclude name="**/Abstract*TestCase.java"/>
<exclude name="**/Abstract*Test.java"/>
In the 'test' taget fixes the broken build. Hope this helps!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Simone Tripodi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> sorry for the silly question, but reading the following message:
>
> [...]
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:906)
> [junit] at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:906)
> [junit] Running
> org.apache.commons.digester.annotations.AbstractAnnotatedPojoTestCase
> [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.013 sec
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/digester/build.xml:282: Test
> org.apache.commons.digester.annotations.AbstractAnnotatedPojoTestCase failed
>
> I've the feeling Gump tries to perform also the Abstract test case...
> should we rename the class in the way Gump ignores it?
> Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ouch!!! :) I'm looking into it NOW!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>> just checked out the digester /trunk and run tests, everything worked
>>>> fine. All new stuff are contained in the current development code.
>>>> I really appreciate you fixed the inglorious compiler problem, there
>>>> are no words to say thank you for saving me a lot of work :P
>>>> At that point I'd consider the sandbox terminated, is there any
>>>> procedure as far as you know to officially declare the status of the
>>>> sandbox 'complete'? I mean, something more than the 'svn rm' :P
>>>>
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> There isn't much ceremony beyond that. I didn't do it myself since I
>>> wanted you to confirm things are good on trunk. Feel free to 'svn rm'
>>> it when you see fit.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Last, but not least: take me in consideration for maintaining that
>>>> code, being myself the first user :)
>>> <snap/>
>>>
>>> Absolutely. BTW, Gump is reporting [1] one test failure if you want to
>>> look into it.
>>>
>>> -Rahul
>>>
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/uhmly745llbwefvr
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
