On 12 September 2010 13:07, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> From what I understand, Gump tries to make sure that our "trunks" stay
> in synch, so it's not honoring the specific BeanUtils dependency, but
> instead running the build against BeanUtils' trunk.  Please correct me
> if I'm wrong someone.  I've never really understood Gump very well. :)

That is what Gump tries to do.

>  Perhaps merely adding a dependency to commons collections would fix
> your Gump issue?

The Gump build already depends on Collections, and it is shown in the classpath.

I don't understand why the missing class is in BeanUtils according to
the stacktrace, yet BeanUtils appears to build OK.

I've asked for some help on the Gump list.

> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi James, Seb,
>> thanks for your feedbacks and your help!!! What is going to drive me
>> crazy is that the latest released digester is successfully using the
>> 1.8.0 release of BeanUtils; the current digester trunk is using the
>> 1.8.3, (with some memory leaks fixes) and doesn't cause errors
>> locally; even testing with only commons-beanutils-core-1.8.3 (a subset
>> of the whole beanutils package) it continues working.
>>
>> Follow below some bash executions on my machine... that's why I don't
>> understand why it should fail on Gump :(
>> All te best,
>> Simo
>>
>> commons-digester simone$ java -version
>> java version "1.5.0_24"
>> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
>> 1.5.0_24-b02-357-10M3065)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_24-149, mixed mode, sharing)
>>
>> commons-digester simone$ mvn -version
>> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 21:16:01+0200)
>> Java version: 1.5.0_24
>> Java home: /XXXXX/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5.0/Home
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman
>> OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.4" arch: "i386" Family: "unix"
>>
>> commons-digester simone$ mvn clean test
>> [...]
>> Tests run: 174, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>>
>> [INFO] 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>> [INFO] 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 8 seconds
>> [INFO] Finished at: Sun Sep 12 13:45:28 CEST 2010
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 27M/508M
>> [INFO] 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM, James Carman
>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:39 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On further investigation, it is collections/trunk - i.e. collections4
>>>> - which does not have FastHashMap.
>>>>
>>>> The default Collections version used by Gump is based on
>>>> tags/PRE_GENERICS_MERGE which does have FastHashMap, so there is a
>>>> different problem.
>>>>
>>>> I'll look further.
>>>
>>> The BeanUtils folks recently decided to remove the collections classes
>>> from their jar(s) in favor of an optional dependency I believe.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to