Hi Mark,
thank a lot for your feedback! I agree with your POV, since we're
using Java1.5 we should take advantage of the whole provided features
:)
Thanks!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 10:32, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> following Phil's suggestion to point out candidates for deprecation /
>> removal, I notice that both GenericObjectPool and
>> GenericObjectPoolFactory share WHEN_EXHAUSTED_* properties of type
>> byte to discriminate the action to perform when the pool is exhausted.
>> Do you agree on replacing byte with enums? I mean, in therms of
>> design, IMHO is much more elegant having something like:
>>
>>     enum WHEN_EXHAUSTED_ACTION = { BLOCK, FAIL, GROW };
>>
>> and at the same time provides to end users more clear API.
>> WDYT? just let me know, have a nice day,
>
> +1.
>
> In general, I am in favour of taking advantage of any and all Java 1.5
> features that lead to cleaner, safer, more readable code. I'm also in
> favour of removing as much unnecessary, unused, deprecated etc code as
> possible.
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to