Well we've had a discussion very similar to this before.
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg15748.html On Oct 16, 2010 6:48 AM, "Simone Tripodi" <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm personally more with Dennis' opinion, but that's just mine idea. > > Question to fill the lack of my knowledge: which is the apache way > when not everybody agrees with one opinion and an important decision - > like this - has to be taken? > > Many thanks in advance, have a nice day, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: >> James Carman wrote: >> >>> If you change the group id, it's probably best to go ahead and change >>> the package names also, in case two versions show up on the same >>> classpath. Maven won't know that org.apache.commons:common-pool is >>> the same as commons-pool:commons-pool, so it would potentially put >>> both on the classpath. I believe there are also binary compatibility >>> issues (hence the 2.0), so changing that would mean we'd want to >>> change it also. >> >> +1 >> >> - Jörg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >
