On Oct 19, 2010, at 9:29 PM, sebb wrote:

> IMO, the ExtendedProperties class has rather odd behaviour.
> 
> It is documented as an extension of normal Java properties, yet it
> allows Objects to be used as values:
> 
> addProperty(String, Object)
> setProperty(String, Object)
> 
> The save() method ignores anything but String and List<String>, so it
> won't save such values.
> 
> The following sequence fails:
> 
> eprop.addProperty("xxx", "true");
> eprop.getString("xxx");
> eprop.getBoolean("xxx");
> eprop.getString("xxx"); // ClassCastException: 'xxx' doesn't map to a
> String object
> 
> This is because the call to getBoolean() replaces the String value
> with a Boolean value.
> Presumably this is intended to make it faster to retrieve next time,
> but it's rather unexpected for a get() method to change the value.
> 
> Is this behaviour really intended?
> 
> If there really is a use case for including non-String values, then it
> seems to me that load() and save() ought to handle these.
> 
> In any case, it seems to me that the get() behaviour ought to be changed.

No comment, other than that now you can see why I didn't touch this class when 
I was working in the branch.

-Matt

> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to