On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:30 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 January 2011 13:01, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Sebb, >> >> ----- "sebb" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> Just had a sudden thought - FastMath is new to 2.2 and 3.0, so does >>> it >>> make sense to list all its bug fixes in the changes document? >> >> As long as their are Jira issues on them, I think they should be referenced. > > But the point is, that these are not changes from the previous > version, because there was no previous version. > > BTW, I've marked all the issues with appliesTo and Fixfor as 2.2&3.0, > so it's easy to see that the code was fixed before initial release. > We have run into this before in [math] and other components. I agree with Luc that it is better to list the changes in the changelog in chronological order.
Phil >> Luc >> >>> >>> [If we do list them, I think they should be numerically ordered] >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
