Le 22/02/2011 01:37, sebb a écrit : > On 21 February 2011 22:10, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: >> Le 21/02/2011 21:09, sebb a écrit : >>> On 21 February 2011 19:32, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: >>>> This vote is cancelled. >>>> >>>> There are some incompatible changes in RC2 in the user level interface >>>> StepHandler, which were not detected by CLIRR. >>>> >>>> I will prepare a new release quickly. >>> >>> I suggest you wait a day or so - there are some other unexplained >>> errors that need investigation. >> >> You are right. >> I have reverted the exception changes further, so there should be less >> compatibility problems with the 2.1 tests. Could you check if things >> have improved with the current branch 2.X ? > > Tests now compile OK, apart from the one that uses EventState.
This is normal. > > But there are quite a few errors/failures. I think most of them are due to either fixed bugs (this is the case for ode) or tests on exception localization which has changed. Could someone check the failing 2.1 tests for GLSMultipleLinearRegressionTest and OLSMultipleLinearRegressionTest ? They fail when running against 2.2 with an error: not enough data (6 rows) for this many predictors (6 predictors). If people consider the failures in these 2.1 tests are normal, I will do another release candidate tomorrow, with a target publication date set to Sunday. > > There are still some issues with exception checking. > > For example, NevilleInterpolatorTest.testParameters() expects to catch > MathException but gets MathUserException. > I think this is a remnant of the changes relating to > FunctionEvaluationException. Yes, I hope to have fixed that by now. > > I think because MathUserException is unchecked the compiler does not > complain that > PolynomialFunctionLagrangeForm.value(double z) throws MathUserException > even though it implements > double value(double x) throws FunctionEvaluationException > > Perhaps this is OK - the code still throws an exception - but it would > be helpful to mention this in the release notes. I have played it safe be completely reverting to former behavior and removed MathUserException. > > BTW, one way to test against the 2.1 test cases is to checkout > branches/2_X, and replace the test tree with a checkout of the 2.1 > test sources. Thanks, this was the way for me to run the tests. I am still unable to run them with test-jar.xml. Luc > >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >>> >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> Le 20/02/2011 16:15, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >>>>> Tag: >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/ >>>>> >>>>> Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/ >>>>> >>>>> Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/maven/ >>>>> >>>>> Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/docs/ >>>>> >>>>> Output of maven:site run against the source distribution: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/site/ >>>>> >>>>> Clirr report: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/site/clirr-report.html >>>>> >>>>> Release notes: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~luc/math-2.2-RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >>>>> >>>>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 2011-02-23T16:00:00 UTC >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Luc >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
