On 5/5/11 1:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > +1 > > I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the > configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI > frameworks Or even Commons Digester which IIRC, this stuff preceded.
Phil > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit : >>>> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in >>>> current or >>>> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. >>>> >>>> Any objections? >>> Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization format that was >>> introduced in Java 1.4 (with java.beans.XMLEncoder/Decoder) ? >>> >>> I don't think DBCP should be tied to a serialization format, so +1 >>> for removing this part in DBCP 2. >> It is really a configuration specification language. See >> *http://s.apache.org/vT. >> >> Phil >> * >>> Emmanuel Bourg >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
