On 06/05/2011 17:55, Phil Steitz wrote: > There are lots of things to consider in making DBCP manageable in > the sense described above. I am starting this discussion now > because I want to make sure that we build whatever we need to build > into pool 2 to make these features possible in DBCP 2. Minimally, > we are going to need a GOP that holds references to checked out > instances and the "maintenance thread" concept now embodied in the > evictor needs to be extended to active instances.
Good points. I need to reflect on what this might mean for the pool2 design. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
