>>> If someone goes and >>> keeps on working stuff ... well ... then that status is nullified by >>> merit. (not through a single commit though) I don't see a reason to >>> forbid svn access > > dormancy should be a "lean status" easy to change into sandbox or > active component. dormancy should be something else than the attic.
+1, I hope we all agree that "dormant" status is kind of "coma" where components can get out from. Indeed, I'm planning to ask you to "resurrect" one of them... :P > > however i think it will be pretty hard to decide if a component is > dormant or just inactive > Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
