Sorry, I'm an idiot, didn't catch it was related to the release :/ Anyway, the patch it has been applied also to OGNL, isn't it? Many thanks in advance, all the best! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Maurizio, > please when discussing about new topics don't hijack the thread > otherwise it could be not easy following both arguments in the same > threads ;) > I'll have a look at it, thanks for reporting!!! > Have a nice day, all the best! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Simone, >> during the JUnit upgrade to version 4, I experienced a strange >> behavior with java 1.5. >> Take a look at [1] and [2] >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9?focusedCommentId=13034888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13034888 >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/pr2qimk5gv777l72 >> >> >> On 12 June 2011 20:39, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Lukasz, >>> I didn't understand how the Apache OGNL could fix the Struts issues, >>> since what we've done is just repackaging and polishing APIs/build; at >>> the end of the day, it still implements exactly the same features on >>> GitHub... can you provide please more details? >>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jochen Wiedmann >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Lukasz Lenart >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Jochen! I'm asking because we have a critical issue with >>>>> Struts 2 build and it's already solved in OGNL ;-) >>>> >>>> If this is urgent, you should consider to put out a new release from >>>> github once more. IMO, we should not miss the opportunity to do some >>>> binary incomatible changes, because the parser stuff is really not as >>>> it ought to be. >>>> >>>> An alternative would be to bring out a new release now and continue >>>> the parser stuff in a branch. But IMO there's no point in doing that, >>>> because the package change is binary incompatible anyways. >>>> >>>> Jochen >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men >>>> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of >>>> everyone. >>>> >>>> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes) >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
