On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > (accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry) > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann > <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Considering [1], I'd say it's more relevant now than, arguably, ever. >> >> Are you sure, that's related? Reading [2], my understanding is that >> JCS doesn't aim to implement JSR-107, but to be "close to". > > My point was that if we have a good cache library @ Commons, I would > assume we could build on that to implement the JSR (if the TCK is > licensed such that we can actually use it, no guarantee there) if we > want to. Perhaps an incorrect assumption, but I have a difficult time > with the concept of "can't be done." >
After reading the link, I suppose the correct course of action would be to gauge the benefits and drawbacks of spec compliance vs. noncompliance. I would suspect it could be nice to implement the JSR while preserving configuration options to disable undesirable features if they continue to seem so after community review. Matt > Matt > >> >> [2] http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/JCSandJCACHE.html >> >> >> >> -- >> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men >> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of >> everyone. >> >> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes) >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
