Hi Simone, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys, > after a failing RC1, thanks to Luc's suggestions I've quickly prepared a > RC2. Please cast your votes and many thanks in advance for your effort on > reviewing!!! > All the best, have a nice weekend, > Simo > > Release Notes: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/3.0/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > Tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/tags/DIGESTER3_3_0_RC2/ > > Site: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/3.0/RC2/site/ > > Binaries: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/3.0/RC2/binaries/ > > Maven artifacts: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-008/ > > [ ] +1 release it > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because +1, builds fine from source MD5 and SHA1 sums are OK. One minor nit though: Neither release notes nor the FAQ explains the package rename, that it is possible to use digester 2.x and 3.x side-by-side and what must be done to upgrade existing code. At least FAQ should be enhanced for something like: Q: After upgrading to Digester 3.x my source no longer compiles! Why is no Digester class found? A: For an upgrade rename packages and normally you're done (blah, blah) ... :) However, an updated site can be deployed after the release ... - Jörg BTW: Building with M2 and Sun JDK 5 I had one time a hanging test in Running org.apache.commons.digester3.xmlrules.SetNamespaceURITestCase where I killed the process after some minutes. Was not repeatable though. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
