StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
testing)

Stephen

On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm willing to vote +1
>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>>
>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
> builds before my commit.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Gary.
>>>
>>> So 4 +1s.
>>>
>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
>>>> -1 :)
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>>>>> IMO
>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>>>>> want
>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>>>>> baked,
>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>>>>> I do
>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>>>>> 3.0.
>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>>>>> go
>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>>>>> POV.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Website:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>>>>> prove
>>>>>>>>>> useful:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>>>> July
>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>  [ ] +1
>>>>>>>>>>  [ ] -1, with reason
>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>>>>>>>>> effort*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to